<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.10" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Company of Heroes Expansion?</title>
	<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/</link>
	<description>The definitive source for all things Relic</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.10</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Simmo</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-41317</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-41317</guid>
					<description>I would also like to see a Soviet expansion.

I'd also like to clear this up for anyone else who reads this, the Russians were not focused on SWARM TACTICS! Sure they had numerical superiority in total number of enlisted men, but in most operations the numerical strength fielded by each side was very close. The only components in which the soviets vastly outnumbered their foe was in armour (about 2 to 1) and heavy guns (about 3 to 1). Only after a battle was it truely evident of Soviet manpower superiority.

So, if Relic is paying attention to these posts I would like them to make note of what I have put in.

That said, here are my ideas for a Soviet expansion: Infantry- Similar to America in Vanilla CoH versatile and cheaper than thier German counterparts. Vehicles- Relativly mobile and resilient, though damage dealt to tougher German tanks (Panthers, Tigers and vet3 Panzers) is limited. Support Waepons (AT Guns, Mortars, etc)- MGs and Mortars wouldBe identical to the other factions, though the AT guns would be non-existant, this role be instead filled by SU-76.

Command Tree 1 Armour (obviously)
One side would focus on abilities to strengthen and enhance the other side of the tree, which would give the player access to (say) T-34/85, SU-85 and finally culminating with an IS-2 "Josef Stalin" Tank.

Command Tree 2 Guards
This tree would focus on solid infantry, with of the the first chioces being the ability to call on Crack Guards infantry, similar in squad size to grenadiers though tougher and more costly. The rest of the tree would be a couple of passive infantry enhancements and two acitves, and one last artillery strike.

Command Tree 3 Support
This tree would focus on artillery strikes (1 Katushya rocket stike which hits fast with moderate damage, and 1 12cm stike, which takes a bit linger to arrive and has fewer hits, but hits very hard) munitions resource enhancement and self propelled guns like the SU-100 and a single SU-152 "Zveroboy" (Beast-Killer) like the Jagdpanther for the Panzer elite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to see a Soviet expansion.</p>

<p>I&#8217;d also like to clear this up for anyone else who reads this, the Russians were not focused on <span class="caps">SWARM TACTICS</span>! Sure they had numerical superiority in total number of enlisted men, but in most operations the numerical strength fielded by each side was very close. The only components in which the soviets vastly outnumbered their foe was in armour (about 2 to 1) and heavy guns (about 3 to 1). Only after a battle was it truely evident of Soviet manpower superiority.</p>

<p>So, if Relic is paying attention to these posts I would like them to make note of what I have put in.</p>

<p>That said, here are my ideas for a Soviet expansion: Infantry- Similar to America in Vanilla CoH versatile and cheaper than thier German counterparts. Vehicles- Relativly mobile and resilient, though damage dealt to tougher German tanks (Panthers, Tigers and vet3 Panzers) is limited. Support Waepons (AT Guns, Mortars, etc)- MGs and Mortars wouldBe identical to the other factions, though the AT guns would be non-existant, this role be instead filled by SU-76.</p>

<p>Command Tree 1 Armour (obviously)<br />
One side would focus on abilities to strengthen and enhance the other side of the tree, which would give the player access to (say) T-34/85, SU-85 and finally culminating with an IS-2 &#8220;Josef Stalin&#8221; Tank.</p>

<p>Command Tree 2 Guards<br />
This tree would focus on solid infantry, with of the the first chioces being the ability to call on Crack Guards infantry, similar in squad size to grenadiers though tougher and more costly. The rest of the tree would be a couple of passive infantry enhancements and two acitves, and one last artillery strike.</p>

<p>Command Tree 3 Support<br />
This tree would focus on artillery strikes (1 Katushya rocket stike which hits fast with moderate damage, and 1 12cm stike, which takes a bit linger to arrive and has fewer hits, but hits very hard) munitions resource enhancement and self propelled guns like the SU-100 and a single SU-152 &#8220;Zveroboy&#8221; (Beast-Killer) like the Jagdpanther for the Panzer elite.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: COHplayer</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-39910</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-39910</guid>
					<description>PLEASE RUSSIAN expansion would be great, I have asked all my friends and they all want russian more than anything. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">PLEASE RUSSIAN </span>expansion would be great, I have asked all my friends and they all want russian more than anything. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Helixteh1st</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-39734</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-39734</guid>
					<description>Hey it looks like the majority wants a Russian expansion, soo how bout it,go make Company of heroes: Eastern fronts or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey it looks like the majority wants a Russian expansion, soo how bout it,go make Company of heroes: Eastern fronts or something like that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allied Juggernaught</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-33938</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-33938</guid>
					<description>Hey if Company of Heroes is going to remain in Europe why the hell havent we seen some dirty russians yet!? T-34's and their swarm tactics. Lets change gears and head east no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey if Company of Heroes is going to remain in Europe why the hell havent we seen some dirty russians yet!? T-34&#8217;s and their swarm tactics. Lets change gears and head east no?</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vojislav</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-29687</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-29687</guid>
					<description>And it would be cool if we had a German campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it would be cool if we had a German campaign.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vojislav</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-29686</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-29686</guid>
					<description>I would only suggest that German units should speak German language,not English with German accent,lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would only suggest that German units should speak German language,not English with German accent,lol</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RetiarySword</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-28812</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-28812</guid>
					<description>What about the commandoes, like the polish and norway evacuees. They were all about sabotage! Could be a laugh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the commandoes, like the polish and norway evacuees. They were all about sabotage! Could be a laugh?</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-28673</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-28673</guid>
					<description>i dont think they should add naval like a lot of you want as maps ar to small to have battle ships etc in tho it would be quite cool to have little boats (inflatable (cant spell sry) ) 
for units so you could go across small rivers etc with out solging over a bridge and getting slaughted by mg fire. sry started talking about mg fire i was just think of band of brothers thats all :) (and i hope youre all ryt about british joining the game yipeee thought i hope they put british tanks in and not the ones the americans gave us)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think they should add naval like a lot of you want as maps ar to small to have battle ships etc in tho it would be quite cool to have little boats (inflatable (cant spell sry) ) <br />
for units so you could go across small rivers etc with out solging over a bridge and getting slaughted by mg fire. sry started talking about mg fire i was just think of band of brothers thats all :) (and i hope youre all ryt about british joining the game yipeee thought i hope they put british tanks in and not the ones the americans gave us)</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mountaineer</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-28059</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-28059</guid>
					<description>Italian campaign would be sweet because a lot of the fighting there was done by the 10thMountain division. Would be cool to see Mountain Infantry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Italian campaign would be sweet because a lot of the fighting there was done by the 10thMountain division. Would be cool to see Mountain Infantry.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Moe</title>
		<link>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-27332</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://relicnews.com/archives/2007/03/company-of-heroes-expansion/#comment-27332</guid>
					<description>Well, duh.  When this was originally posted there was no confirmation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, duh.  When this was originally posted there was no confirmation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
